vIDC.cn 的空间是不错啊

空心菜 · 发表于 2007-7-13

用了大概有半年了 速度好又稳定 我一直用它 测试空间：<a href="http://myshop.org.cn" target="_blank">http://myshop.org.cn</a>

cpuer · 发表于 2007-7-13

C:\Documents and Settings\cpu>ping myshop.org.cn Pinging myshop.org.cn [59.53.88.50] with 32 bytes o Reply from 59.53.88.50: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=119 Reply from 59.53.88.50: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=119 Reply from 59.53.88.50: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=119 Reply from 59.53.88.50: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=119 Ping statistics for 59.53.88.50:     Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% l Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:     Minimum = 34ms, Maximum = 37ms, Average = 35ms 跟我的签名速度一般。

华伦圣天 · 发表于 2007-7-13

Pinging myshop.org.cn [59.53.88.50] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 59.53.88.50: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=119 Reply from 59.53.88.50: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=119 Reply from 59.53.88.50: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=119 Reply from 59.53.88.50: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=119 Ping statistics for 59.53.88.50:     Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:     Minimum = 21ms, Maximum = 22ms, Average = 21ms

华伦圣天 · 发表于 2007-7-13

Pinging <a href="http://www.huapc.com" target="_blank">www.huapc.com</a> [218.6.2.66] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 218.6.2.66: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=122 Reply from 218.6.2.66: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=122 Reply from 218.6.2.66: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=122 Reply from 218.6.2.66: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=122 Ping statistics for 218.6.2.66:     Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:     Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

小陆橙子 · 发表于 2007-7-13

是个AD啊

空心菜 · 发表于 2007-7-13

不是ad

aocool · 发表于 2007-7-13

1500M(vs1500)   现价: 499元/年   这样的空间那样的速度很一般了

电光 · 发表于 2007-7-13

耳木 · 发表于 2007-7-13

imagine · 发表于 2007-7-13

		自动登录	找回密码
密码			注册